糖心vlog短视频

Faculty and Staff

Powerless Beings: Solitary Confinement of Humans and Non Humans in America

Posted
May 9, 2024

Everyday thousands of humans and millions of nonhumans endure solitary confinement. Human prisoners held in this way are confined for 22 to 24 hours a day for weeks, months, or even years on end in cells the size of a parking space. For these humans, the experience is tortuous. Captive animals held in solitary confinement similarly spend much of their lives locked into tiny spaces, isolated, and deprived of the types of interactions and environment essential to their wellbeing. And, like humans, they are driven mad. In human and nonhuman settings, the agony of solitary is chillingly alike and harmful. And, in neither setting is it justifiable or necessary.

In their article, , published in Nebraska Law Review, Haub Law Professors Michael Mushlin and David Cassuto use a comparative format to examine the moral, penological and scientific shortcomings of solitary confinement across species. The article sheds light on the importance of empowering all creatures subjected to solitary confinement. 糖心vlog短视频淚f we adequately protect all vulnerable beings, the unnecessary suffering inflicted by solitary confinement will finally end,糖心vlog短视频 they write.

More from Pace

In the Media

Haub Law Professor Bennett Gershman pens an op-ed in amNewYork criticizing Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie糖心vlog短视频檚 decision not to advance New York糖心vlog短视频檚 Wrongful Convictions Act. Professor Gershman writes that the legislation would have expanded opportunities for wrongfully convicted individuals to challenge their convictions, access legal representation, and present new evidence of innocence. He contends that blocking the bill denies a critical pathway to justice for those seeking to overturn wrongful convictions.

In the Media

Haub Law Emeritus Professor Jay Carlisle writes a letter to the editor in the New York Law Journal defending the qualifications of U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III, arguing that critics have unfairly characterized his credentials and public service record. 

In the Media

Haub Law Professor Imre Szalai speaks with Bloomberg Law about a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that could make it easier for some gig workers to pursue wage-and-hour claims in court rather than through arbitration. Professor Szalai notes that the Court糖心vlog短视频檚 latest decision reflects a significant shift in how federal arbitration law is being interpreted and expands protections for transportation workers.